View all solutions
Cosmetics/Pharma

CGMP (Current Good Manufacturing Practice)

An environmental control and procedure management system that ensures quality, safety, and efficacy throughout cosmetics manufacturing, packaging, and storage processes.

ISO 22716 (Cosmetics GMP International Standard)
01

Are you facing these challenges?

1. The record-keeping burden for GMP certification is overwhelming

To obtain or maintain Cosmetics GMP (ISO 22716) or Pharmaceutical GMP (FDA 21 CFR Part 211) certification, you must systematically maintain extensive documentation and records including batch manufacturing records (BMR), deviation reports, change control history, SOP management, and training records. When these records are scattered across multiple systems and documents, every audit response consumes significant time.

2. Deviation and change handling procedures are inconsistent

When deviations occur, the process from severity assessment (Critical/Major/Minor), root cause analysis, CAPA, to effectiveness verification varies from person to person. If change control regulatory impact assessments and review committee decisions are not systematically recorded, audit findings are likely.

3. OOS (Out-of-Specification) investigations are not conducted per FDA guidance

When test results fall outside specifications, it is difficult to complete the FDA-required Phase I (laboratory investigation) -> Phase II (full-scale investigation) procedure within the prescribed timeframe (30 days). Escalation criteria are ambiguous, and investigation progress tracking is often absent.

4. Equipment qualification (DQ/IQ/OQ/PQ) and cleaning validation management

When introducing new equipment or modifying existing equipment, qualification assessments must be performed in the sequence DQ -> IQ -> OQ -> PQ, but managing each stage's protocol, results, and deviation handling in separate documents easily breaks the connection between stages. A systematic approach is also needed for cleaning validation residue limits, sampling points, and Hold Time management.

5. Batch Manufacturing Record (BMR) management and release approval process

When compounding, weighing, filling, and IPC (In-Process Control) records rely on paper BMRs, QA review before release is time-consuming and tracking errors in records is difficult. Particularly, a record structure that reflects cosmetics manufacturing process characteristics such as emulsification, homogenization, and curing is required.


02

Here is how we solve it

GMP-required records accumulate automatically during daily operations

The requirements of ISO 22716's 17 clauses and FDA 21 CFR Part 211 are reflected in the system architecture. Data across all GMP domains -- batch records, deviation management, change control, SOPs, training, equipment qualification, raw material/packaging management, and quality testing -- accumulates naturally as daily work is performed.

  • SOP document management: Automatic revision history recording, linkage to previous versions (supersedes_id), distribution management
  • Training: Training types (initial/periodic/change-driven/special), effectiveness verification, expiry alert workflow
  • Health examinations: 4 examination types (pre-employment/periodic/special/return-to-work), monthly automatic scan, manufacturing area restriction management

Deviations and changes are handled through standardized procedures

Deviation management: When a deviation occurs, severity is assessed in 3 levels (Critical/Major/Minor), and the workflow automatically branches based on severity. The entire cycle of root cause analysis -> CAPA establishment -> execution -> effectiveness verification proceeds within the system, with a CAPA re-establishment loop operating until effectiveness is confirmed. This aligns with deviation management processes required by ICH Q7/Q10.

Change control: When a change is requested, a regulatory impact assessment is performed, and changes with regulatory impact go through a change review committee quorum vote (default 3/5). Impact assessment, implementation plan, and completion verification are systematically recorded. When a change is approved, related training is automatically generated, ensuring that communication of change content to the shop floor is never missed.

OOS investigations completed within 30 days per FDA guidance

A 3-Phase investigation workflow per FDA's 'Investigating Out-of-Specification (OOS) Test Results' guidance is implemented.

  • Phase I: Laboratory investigation (analyst error, instrument issues, reagent problems)
  • Phase II: Full-scale investigation covering manufacturing process, raw materials, environment, etc.
  • 30-day timer: Automatic investigation deadline tracking, escalation to QA Director if exceeded
  • Integration with QMS CAPA process, linking investigation results to corrective actions

Equipment qualification managed stage by stage

DQ (Design Qualification) -> IQ (Installation Qualification) -> OQ (Operational Qualification) -> PQ (Performance Qualification) -> Requalification -- each stage is connected through a sequential workflow. A 22-step workflow designed per EU GMP Annex 15 requirements.

  • Automatic deviation record generation when non-conformance is found at any stage
  • DQ remediation loop: Up to 2 remediation opportunities for design non-conformances
  • Requalification triggers: Initiated upon equipment modification, relocation, or periodic reassessment
  • Cleaning validation: CIP/COP methods, rinse/swab sampling, residue acceptance limits, Hold Time management

Seamless flow from Batch Manufacturing Record (BMR) to release approval

Batch records are structured to reflect cosmetics manufacturing characteristics (emulsification, homogenization, curing, etc.), with systematic recording of formulations (formula), weighing records, and compounding conditions. Records follow each process step (raw material weighing -> compounding -> filling -> packaging -> QC -> QA review -> release), with IPC checking pH, viscosity, temperature, fill weight, and more.

  • Release approval: Through the QA release approval workflow, batch record review -> quality test confirmation -> release decision is executed. Release is approved only after confirming all IPC items pass, quality test results conform, and there are no open deviations.
  • Packaging/Labeling: Packaging inspection records, INCI (ingredient listing) verification, functional claim checks, and barcode verification are systematically performed. This proactively prevents recall risk from labeling errors.
  • Retained samples: Retention period and storage condition management, daily automatic expiry scan to comply with Section 211.170 requirements. Expired retained samples are automatically classified for disposal.
  • POP shop floor screens: BMR data is entered via touch interface on shop floor screens in weighing rooms, compounding rooms, filling rooms, etc. Record errors are reduced compared to paper BMRs, and process progress can be confirmed in real time. Andon reporting feature immediately alerts supervisors when a shop floor anomaly occurs.

Practical scenario: Manufacturing a moisturizing cream batch. At the weighing room POP, raw material weights are entered and automatically compared against formulation tolerances. In the compounding room, emulsification temperature, homogenization time, and curing conditions are recorded. After filling, IPC confirms pH 5.2 (specification 4.5-5.5), viscosity 12,000 cP (specification 10,000-15,000 cP). If all IPC items pass, QC testing (microbial, heavy metals, stability) proceeds, and finally QA reviews the entire batch record and approves release.


03

Global standards this solution follows

In the cosmetics and pharmaceutical GMP domain, there are multiple regulatory standards including ISO 22716 (Cosmetics), FDA 21 CFR Part 211 (Pharmaceuticals), EU GMP, ICH Guidelines, and PIC/S. These standards serve as the basis for GMP certification, overseas export qualification, and regulatory audit response.

ISO 22716:2007 -- Cosmetics GMP

Why does this standard matter? ISO 22716 is the international GMP standard specific to cosmetics manufacturing. Domestically, it serves as the basis for regulatory authority cosmetics GMP certification, and mandatory GMP compliance has been expanding in phases since 2024. ISO 22716 compliance is required for EU market exports under the Cosmetics Regulation (EC 1223/2009), and is also recognized in major export markets including ASEAN and Japan. Without certification, export eligibility may be restricted.

How is this applied in VEXPLOR?

ISO 22716 ClauseWhat it means for your operationsVEXPLOR Implementation
cl.3.2 TrainingPersonnel competency must be ensured and training documentedTraining records (4 training types, effectiveness verification, expiry alert workflow)
cl.3.3 Personnel Hygiene/HealthManufacturing personnel health status must be verified and managedHealth examinations (4 types, monthly automatic scan, fit_for_work, manufacturing area restrictions)
cl.5 Raw Materials/PackagingRaw material receipt, testing, storage, and traceability must be managedRaw material specifications + raw material management (receipt/testing/automatic remaining quantity calculation) + packaging material specifications
cl.6 Facilities/EquipmentEquipment qualification, water quality, and environment must be managedEquipment qualification (DQ/IQ/OQ/PQ) + water system + hygiene management
cl.9 ProductionBatch manufacturing records (BMR) must be prepared and processes managedElectronic BMR (formulation/weighing records/compounding conditions JSON, 7 process stages)
cl.10 Quality ControlRaw material/finished product testing, specifications, and stability must be managedQuality test records + test parameters + stability testing + analytical method validation
cl.11 Packaging/LabelingPackaging inspection, INCI listing, and label accuracy must be verifiedPackaging management + labeling management (INCI verification, functional claim checks, barcode verification)
cl.14 ComplaintsCustomer complaints must be received, investigated, and resolvedComplaint records (5 complaint sources) + complaint handling workflow (WF12)
cl.15 Change/DeviationChanges and deviations must be systematically managed and CAPA performedChange control (regulatory impact branching, review committee voting) + deviation management (3-level severity, CAPA loop)
cl.16 Self-InspectionInternal audits must be conducted to verify GMP compliance statusInternal audit/supplier audit + findings/corrective action linkage
cl.17 Document ControlGMP documents such as SOPs must be systematically managedSOP document management (revision history, previous version linkage, distribution management)

FDA 21 CFR Part 211 -- Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Pharmaceuticals

Why does this standard matter? Companies exporting OTC drugs or cosmetics (FDA-regulated) to the United States, or those requiring FDA registration, must comply with this regulation. FDA inspections verify compliance across all domains including batch record management, OOS investigations, retained samples, laboratory controls, and equipment management. Korean pharmaceutical GMP (KGMP) also references this regulation, making it important for domestic pharmaceutical companies as well.

How is this applied in VEXPLOR?

21 CFR Part 211 SubpartWhat it means for your operationsVEXPLOR Implementation
Subpart B: Organization/PersonnelQualifications, training, and health management are requiredTraining records + health examinations (4 types) + manufacturing area restrictions
Subpart C: Buildings/FacilitiesManufacturing environment and water quality must be managedHygiene management + water system (water quality testing, automatic quarantine workflow)
Subpart D: EquipmentEquipment qualification and cleaning must be validatedEquipment qualification (DQ/IQ/OQ/PQ 22 steps) + cleaning validation (CIP/COP)
Subpart E: Raw Material ControlsRaw materials must be received, tested, and storedRaw material specifications + raw material management (receipt/testing/remaining quantity)
Subpart F: Production/Process ControlsBatch records must be prepared and IPC performedElectronic BMR + IPC (automatic specification comparison) + release approval workflow
Subpart G: Packaging/LabelingPackaging and labeling must be managedPackaging management + labeling management + packaging material specifications
Subpart I: Laboratory ControlsAnalytical method validation and OOS investigations must be performedAnalytical method validation (ICH Q2) + OOS 3-Phase workflow (30-day timer)
Subpart J: Records/ReportsDocuments must be managed and retained samples maintainedSOP document management + retained samples (daily automatic expiry scan)
Section 211.192Production records must be reviewed before batch releaseQA release approval workflow (batch record review -> quality test confirmation -> release decision)
Section 211.170Retained samples must be stored for the prescribed periodRetained sample management (daily CRON automatic expiry scan)

EU GMP Annex 15 -- Validation

Why does this standard matter? Companies exporting pharmaceuticals or cosmetics to Europe, or those requiring EU-GMP mutual recognition, must comply with Annex 15 validation requirements. It specifies protocols, execution, reports, and revalidation criteria for equipment qualification (DQ/IQ/OQ/PQ), process validation, cleaning validation, and analytical method validation.

How is this applied in VEXPLOR?

EU GMP Annex 15 RequirementWhat it means for your operationsVEXPLOR Implementation
Validation Master Plan (VMP)Validation strategy and scope must be documentedValidation records (protocol name, objective, scope management)
Equipment Qualification DQ/IQ/OQ/PQNew or modified equipment qualification must be verified stage by stage22-step sequential workflow, automatic deviation generation on non-conformance at each stage
Process ValidationManufacturing processes must be verified to consistently produce results within specificationValidation records (acceptance criteria, test parameters, number of runs)
Cleaning ValidationResidues after equipment cleaning must be verified within acceptance limitsCIP/COP, rinse/swab sampling, residue acceptance limits, Hold Time management
Analytical Method ValidationAccuracy and reproducibility of test methods must be verifiedICH Q2(R1) parameters (specificity/linearity/accuracy/precision/LOD/LOQ)
Revalidation/RequalificationReverification is required after changes or elapsed timeRequalification triggers + revalidation status management

ICH Q7/Q10 -- Pharmaceutical Quality System

Why does this standard matter? ICH Q7 (GMP for APIs) and Q10 (Pharmaceutical Quality System) are pharmaceutical quality management guidelines recognized by major regulatory authorities worldwide (FDA, EMA, PMDA). They define core processes for pharmaceutical quality system operations including deviation management, change control, complaints/recalls, and knowledge management.

How is this applied in VEXPLOR?

ICH GuidelineWhat it means for your operationsVEXPLOR Implementation
Q7 Section 12: Deviation ManagementSeverity assessment, root cause analysis, and CAPA must be performed when deviations occurDeviation management (3-level severity) + CAPA effectiveness verification re-establishment loop workflow
Q7 Section 13: Change ControlRegulatory impact must be assessed and approval obtained for changesChange control (regulatory impact branching, review committee quorum voting, automatic training generation)
Q7 Section 14: Complaints/RecallsComplaints must be received, investigated, and products recalled when necessaryComplaint records + product recall (Class I/II/III) + workflows (WF12/WF13)
Q10: Pharmaceutical Quality SystemAn integrated quality system encompassing SOPs, CAPA, change control, and knowledge management is requiredThe entire solution is designed as an integrated quality system (SOP -> BMR -> testing -> release)

ICH Q1A(R2)/Q2(R1) -- Stability Testing/Analytical Method Validation

Why does this standard matter? Stability testing for shelf-life determination (Q1A) and reliability verification of analytical methods (Q2) are mandatory data for regulatory submissions to the FDA, EMA, and domestic regulatory authorities.

How is this applied in VEXPLOR?

  • ICH Q1A(R2) Stability Testing: Accelerated/long-term/photostability conditions, time-point test management, trend analysis workflow (WF10)
  • ICH Q2(R1) Analytical Method Validation: 7 parameter management -- specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, repeatability, robustness, LOD, LOQ

PIC/S and WHO GMP

Why does this standard matter? PIC/S (Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme) is a GMP inspection cooperation body with over 50 participating regulatory authorities worldwide. Korea's regulatory authority is also a PIC/S member, and domestic pharmaceutical GMP standards are equivalent to PIC/S standards. WHO GMP is the global pharmaceutical quality standard including developing countries, required for WHO Prequalification (PQ) assessments or international tenders.

How is this applied in VEXPLOR?

  • PIC/S Guide PE 009: Detailed cleaning validation requirements (sampling point JSON, residue acceptance limits, CIP/COP methods, Hold Time) are incorporated
  • WHO GMP (TRS 986): WHO GMP requirements are met through ISO 22716 and FDA 21 CFR Part 211 coverage. No additional configuration is needed.

04

How this differs from existing systems

Compared to paper/spreadsheet-based GMP management

Legacy ApproachVEXPLOR cGMP
Handwritten entries in paper BMRs; QA review before release is time-consumingElectronic BMR, automatic recording per process stage, QA release approval workflow
Form filling and manual circulation when deviations occurAutomatic branching by severity, workflow through CAPA effectiveness verification
Change control handled through meeting minutes and separate formsRegulatory impact branching, review committee quorum voting, automatic training generation
Manual printing/distribution/retrieval for SOP revisionsElectronic SOP, automatic revision history, previous version linkage
Each equipment qualification stage managed in separate bindersDQ -> IQ -> OQ -> PQ sequential workflow, automatic deviation generation

Compared to specialized GMP software

AreaSAP PH&LSVeeva VaultMasterControlTrackWiseVEXPLOR cGMP
Batch Records (BMR)StrengthWeaknessWeaknessWeaknessCosmetics manufacturing characteristics reflected (emulsification/homogenization/curing)
Deviation/CAPAStrengthModerateStrengthStrengthCAPA effectiveness verification re-establishment loop included
OOS InvestigationStrengthWeaknessModerateModerateFDA 3-Phase, 30-day timer, escalation
Equipment QualificationModerateWeaknessModerateModerateDQ/IQ/OQ/PQ 22-step sequential workflow
Water SystemModerateWeaknessWeaknessWeaknessWater quality testing, automatic quarantine workflow
Retained SamplesModerateWeaknessWeaknessWeaknessDaily automatic expiry scan
Health ExaminationsWeaknessNot supportedWeaknessNot supported4 types, monthly automatic scan, manufacturing area restrictions
Shop Floor (POP) ScreensWeaknessNot supportedNot supportedNot supported5 POP screens, touch-optimized, Andon reporting
Manufacturing System IntegrationStrengthModerateModerateModerateIntegration with QMS/MES/ERP/LIMS/HACCP and 9 other solutions

SAP PH&LS has the most extensive implementation track record at large pharmaceutical companies with industry-leading batch records and deviation/change management. Veeva Vault and MasterControl have strengths in document management and regulatory compliance. VEXPLOR cGMP differentiates through shop floor proximity (POP screens, electronic BMR, water system, health examinations) and cross-solution integration (QMS/MES/ERP/LIMS/HACCP integration).


05

How does it compare to global solutions?

If your company uses or is evaluating specialized GMP software such as SAP PH&LS, Veeva Vault, MasterControl, or TrackWise, the following comparison may help your assessment.

Detailed comparison by functional area

Functional AreaSAP PH&LSVeeva VaultMasterControlTrackWiseVEXPLOR cGMPWhat it means for you
BMR/Batch RecordsTop-tierBasicBasicLimitedTop-tierElectronic BMR reflecting cosmetics manufacturing characteristics (emulsification/homogenization/curing)
SOP/Document ManagementStrongTop-tierTop-tierBasicTop-tierRevision history, previous version linkage, distribution management
Deviation/CAPATop-tierStrongTop-tierTop-tierTop-tier3-level severity + CAPA effectiveness verification re-establishment loop
Change ControlTop-tierStrongStrongTop-tierTop-tierRegulatory impact branching + review committee quorum voting + automatic training generation
OOS InvestigationTop-tierLimitedBasicStrongTop-tierFDA 3-Phase, 30-day timer, escalation
ValidationStrongBasicStrongStrongTop-tierIntegrated management of process/analytical method/cleaning validation
Equipment QualificationStrongLimitedBasicBasicTop-tierDQ/IQ/OQ/PQ 22-step sequential workflow, automatic deviation generation on non-conformance
Cleaning ValidationStrongLimitedBasicBasicStrongCIP/COP, rinse/swab sampling, Hold Time management
Water SystemStrongNot supportedLimitedLimitedTop-tierWater quality testing, automatic quarantine workflow on non-conformance
Stability TestingTop-tierBasicBasicStrongStrongAccelerated/long-term/photostability, time-point test management
Retained SamplesBasicLimitedLimitedLimitedTop-tierDaily automatic expiry scan (FDA 211.170 compliance)
TrainingStrongTop-tierTop-tierBasicTop-tier4 training types, effectiveness verification, automatic training generation on change
Health ExaminationsLimitedNot supportedLimitedNot supportedTop-tier4 types, monthly automatic scan, manufacturing area restriction management
Packaging/LabelingStrongLimitedLimitedLimitedTop-tierINCI verification, functional claim checks, barcode verification
Complaints/RecallsStrongBasicStrongTop-tierBasicComplaint receipt/investigation/resolution, Recall Class I/II/III (enhancement in progress)
Self-InspectionStrongStrongStrongTop-tierStrongInternal audit/supplier audit, findings/corrective action linkage
POP Shop Floor ScreensLimitedNot supportedNot supportedNot supportedTop-tier5 POP screens, touch-optimized, Andon reporting
Document TemplatesStrongTop-tierTop-tierBasicStrongBMR/deviation report/change control/validation -- 4 types
Cross-Solution IntegrationTop-tierBasicBasicBasicTop-tier20 integration points across 9 solutions including QMS/MES/ERP/LIMS/HACCP

Compared to SAP PH&LS

SAP PH&LS has the most extensive implementation track record at large pharmaceutical companies with industry-leading batch records and deviation/change management.

What SAP PH&LS has that VEXPLOR currently has limited support for: Stability testing time-point data normalization (VEXPLOR implements basic structure only), dedicated Annual Product Quality Review (APR/PQR) functionality, large-scale multi-site global rollout proven track record.

What VEXPLOR has that requires separate implementation in SAP PH&LS: 5 POP shop floor screens (touch-optimized, Andon reporting), 4-type health examinations (monthly automatic scan, manufacturing area restrictions), water system automatic quarantine on non-conformance, retained sample daily automatic expiry scan, packaging/labeling INCI verification and functional claim checks.

Compared to Veeva Vault/MasterControl

Veeva Vault and MasterControl are industry leaders in document management and training, with particular strengths in regulatory document management (RA/regulatory submissions).

What Veeva/MasterControl has that VEXPLOR currently has limited support for: Dedicated 21 CFR Part 11 Audit Trail/electronic signature functionality (VEXPLOR is at basic level, enhancement in progress), regulatory submission document management (RA module), industry-specific pre-configured document template packages.

What VEXPLOR has as strengths over Veeva/MasterControl: BMR reflecting cosmetics manufacturing characteristics, OOS 3-Phase investigation (30-day timer), equipment qualification 22-step sequential workflow, dedicated water system/health examination/retained sample management, 5 POP shop floor screens, 20 cross-solution integration points across 9 solutions.

Compared to TrackWise

TrackWise (Honeywell/Sparta Systems) is a product specialized in deviation/CAPA/change management, widely used in pharmaceutical companies.

What TrackWise has that VEXPLOR currently has limited support for: Depth of dedicated complaint handling/product recall functionality (TrackWise is top-tier in this area), template variety for self-inspection/audit.

What VEXPLOR has that is not supported or requires separate implementation in TrackWise: BMR/batch record management, SOP document management (TrackWise has basic document management), equipment qualification assessment, water system, retained samples, health examinations, packaging/labeling, POP shop floor screens, cross-solution integration.

Unique strengths of VEXPLOR cGMP

Differentiating FeatureDescriptionCompetitor Status
29-table integrated data modelSingle solution covering all cGMP domainsSAP uses separate modules; Veeva/MasterControl are document-centric
11 automated workflowsEnd-to-end from batch release to trainingTrackWise specializes in deviation/CAPA; lacks manufacturing process workflows
FDA 3-Phase OOS workflow30-day timer + built-in escalationMost competitors require manual management or separate modules
DQ/IQ/OQ/PQ sequential workflow22 steps, automatic deviation generation on non-conformance at each stageSAP/TrackWise support this but with high configuration complexity
5 POP shop floor screensTouch-optimized, dark theme, Andon reportingMost competitors do not support POP or require separate MES
20 cross-solution integration points across 9 solutionsIntegration with QMS/MES/ERP/LIMS/HACCP, etc.Only SAP offers comparable level; others require individual integrations
timer_trigger utilizationRetained sample daily / health examination monthly automatic scanMore proactive management compared to other products

Areas where VEXPLOR cGMP is relatively weaker: Dedicated 21 CFR Part 11 Audit Trail/electronic signature functionality is under enhancement. Complaint handling/product recall workflows are at basic level (WF12/WF13 added, further enhancement needed). Stability testing time-point data normalization and APR/PQR functionality are included in the future roadmap.


06

Expected benefits after implementation

Streamlined GMP certification acquisition/maintenance

  • Records required for certification audits accumulate automatically during daily operations, significantly reducing audit preparation time.
  • SOP management, training history, and deviation/change records are systematically managed, reducing the risk of audit findings.

Quality incident prevention

  • When deviations occur, standardized response procedures based on severity ensure handling consistency. The CAPA effectiveness verification loop prevents recurrence of the same issue.
  • Regulatory impact assessment and automatic training generation during change control reduce quality incident risk from changes.

Reduced batch release time

  • Electronic BMR and QA release approval workflow can shorten the time from batch review to release decision.
  • IPC results, quality test results, and packaging/labeling inspection results are confirmed in one place, improving pre-release review efficiency.

OOS investigation deadline compliance

  • The 30-day timer and escalation ensure OOS investigations are completed within the prescribed timeframe.
  • Investigation progress is tracked in real time, enabling managers to immediately assess current status.

Systematic equipment/facility validation

  • Connected DQ/IQ/OQ/PQ stage records provide a complete view of equipment history at a glance.
  • Requalification triggers and cleaning validation records facilitate audit response for equipment-related compliance.

07

Solution configuration summary

AreaKey Features
Batch Records (BMR)Formulations, weighing records, compounding conditions, 7 process stages, QA release approval workflow
IPC In-Process ControlAutomatic specification comparison for pH/viscosity/temperature/fill weight, etc.
Raw MaterialsRaw material specifications, receipt management, automatic remaining quantity calculation, supplier qualification management
Quality TestingTest record/test parameter normalization, raw material/finished product testing
Deviation Management3-level severity (Critical/Major/Minor), CAPA effectiveness verification re-establishment loop
Change ControlRegulatory impact branching, review committee quorum voting, automatic training generation
OOS InvestigationFDA 3-Phase, 30-day timer, QA Director escalation
ValidationProcess validation, analytical method validation (ICH Q2), cleaning validation (CIP/COP)
Equipment QualificationDQ/IQ/OQ/PQ/requalification, 22-step sequential workflow, automatic deviation generation on non-conformance
Stability TestingAccelerated/long-term/photostability, time-point test management
Packaging/LabelingPackaging inspection, INCI listing verification, functional claim checks, packaging material specifications
Complaints/Product RecallComplaint receipt/investigation/resolution, Recall Class I/II/III, recovery rate calculation
Water SystemWater quality testing, automatic quarantine on non-conformance, HACCP integration
Health Examinations4 types (pre-employment/periodic/special/return-to-work), monthly automatic scan, manufacturing area restrictions
Retained SamplesRetention period/condition management, daily automatic expiry scan
SOP Document ManagementRevision history, previous version linkage, distribution management
Training4 types (initial/periodic/change-driven/special), effectiveness verification, expiry alerts
Self-Inspection/AuditInternal audit, supplier audit, findings/corrective action linkage

08

Key Business Flows

From batch manufacturing to release

Production plan received -> Raw material weighing (POP screen, automatic verification against formulation)
  -> Compounding (emulsification/homogenization/curing condition recording) -> IPC In-Process Control (pH/viscosity/temperature/fill weight)
  -> [IPC Pass] -> Filling -> Packaging inspection (INCI/barcode/label verification)
  -> QC quality testing (microbial/physicochemical/stability) -> [Pass] -> QA batch record review -> Release approval
  -> [IPC or QC Fail] -> Deviation record -> Corrective action -> Retest or disposal

Deviation handling flow

Deviation discovered -> Deviation registration (type: equipment/raw material/process/environment/procedure/human/other)
  -> Severity assessment (Critical/Major/Minor) -> [Critical] Immediate production halt + executive notification
  -> Root cause analysis -> CAPA establishment -> Execution -> Effectiveness verification
  -> [Effectiveness not met] -> CAPA re-establishment (loop) -> Re-execution -> Re-verification
  -> [Effectiveness confirmed] -> Deviation closure -> Related SOP update (if needed)

Change control flow

Change request -> Regulatory impact assessment (regulatory_impact)
  -> [Regulatory impact present] -> Change review committee (quorum 3/5 vote)
  -> [No regulatory impact] -> Department head approval
  -> Implementation plan -> Related training automatically generated -> Change execution
  -> Completion verification -> Effectiveness validation -> Change closure

Equipment qualification flow

New/modified equipment -> DQ (Design Qualification) -> [Non-conformance: up to 2 remediations]
  -> IQ (Installation Qualification) -> [Non-conformance: automatic deviation generation] -> Corrective action and reassessment
  -> OQ (Operational Qualification) -> [Non-conformance: automatic deviation generation] -> Corrective action and reassessment
  -> PQ (Performance Qualification) -> [Non-conformance: automatic deviation generation] -> Corrective action and reassessment
  -> Qualification confirmed -> Production use approval
  -> [Elapsed time or change occurred] -> Requalification trigger
09

Ideal for these companies

  • Cosmetics manufacturers: Companies that need to obtain or maintain ISO 22716 (Cosmetics GMP) certification. Companies preparing for phased mandatory compliance starting from 2024
  • OTC drug/cosmetics exporters: Companies exporting to the US that require FDA registration, companies exporting to Europe that need EU-GMP compliance
  • Pharmaceutical companies: Companies seeking to systematize batch records, deviation management, change control, and OOS investigations based on pharmaceutical GMP
  • Combined cosmetics/pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities: Multi-product manufacturing facilities that need to integrate food/cosmetics/pharmaceutical GMP management alongside the HACCP solution

10

Solutions that work well together

SolutionIntegration Details
QMSCAPA process sharing, internal audit integration, supplier quality management
MESEquipment data, LOT tracking, process parameter integration
ERPRaw material/product information, trading partner, inventory management integration
LIMSRaw material/finished product quality testing, OOS investigation, stability testing integration
HACCPWater system sharing, hygiene management integration (for combined facilities)
EAMEquipment management, calibration management, preventive maintenance integration
WMSRetained sample location management, raw material/finished product storage condition integration

Try it yourself

Apply the CGMP (Current Good Manufacturing Practice) template on the canvas, and data models to screens are auto-generated.

VEXPLOR — Install an OS in Your Factory | Manufacturing AI Operating System